![]() ![]() Because of the amount of keyboard hotkeys used the input process can get realy efficient, much faster then realtime, often. Seraph, you should try to once see a tracker being used by a expert. Last edited by seraph on Mon 10:58 pm edited 1 time in total You guys will have to explain to me what is the advantage of using a tracker versus a sequencer because I don't get it, maybe I am simply too old for this ****ĭon't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer There's other buzz clones, but I like the progress of buzzle the most. I like the way it looks, and as a newbie to tracking, it's visual aids (like colorizing & showing a "rainbow" that connects the moudlar interface to tracks) makes things quick to learn. No longer supported, only developed through aditional plugins.Ī replacement for Buzz, just getting off the ground, but it improves the user interface of buzz, while maintaining it's useful (& efficient!) machines, while adding native VST support. ![]() Has it's own plugin architecture-"buzz machines", but through one of these machines, it can support VST as well. (but no OS9/X- booooo!- but there is one for Palm- hooray!) <Įdit- Cool thanks Strobe Here's my 2 cents (and I'll make the window sticky ) Xm player vs milkytracker free#> Moderators and Editors are free too extend this list until it bursts. New FastTracker II Compatible clone for windows.Ĭreating music for the Gameboy soundchip, also exports to NSFĬreating music with the very popular SID Chip , Subject description: Links to different soundtrackersįor creating music using the 2A03 Sound Chip , Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in Chat Roomįorum index » Discussion » Composition » lofi FAQ Calendar Search Memberlist Usergroups Links ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |